Future of Art Interview: Moe Murdock

The Future of Art is an interview series where I speak with artists on the topics of sustainability and climate change in relation to their artistic practices. The series aims to explore a range of viewpoints, not only those of artists working directly with these topics but also how it affects the practices of all artists, no matter their chosen themes or mediums.

Our next artist is Moe Murdock. Moe Murdock is a painter working primarily in the digital realms. He lives and works in Jersey city, USA.

"Greetings from Norway", 2019, digital artwork.

Tell us about your art. What do you create and why?

I always struggle to describe what my work is and what I like to paint. The best description would be that I’m a surrealist painter that likes to add oddities or points of curiosity to my work. Or rather a lot of my work borders on the surrealist end, but that all depends on how I am feeling or the idea that pops in my head. Sometimes I just like to paint flowers or something simple like clouds. It depends on the vibe I get from the object or image plus my mood. 

 

How long have you been practicing as an artist?

I have always been artistic, the artist in the group or the “class artist” growing up. As of my adult life I would say I’ve been working at honing my craft for the past 20 years (wow!).

Have the topics of climate change and/or sustainability affected your artistic practice either directly or indirectly?

As far as the things that drive me to create work, “no”. However, growing up we were always taught the values of not wasting things (food, materials, time) because those things are precious. Those values have stayed with me as part of my adult life. Working as a digital artist came easier to me than traditional and the by-product of not wasting materials and working virtually is an added bonus.

"Embankment Refinery", 2015, digital artwork.

"Atlanta Diner", 2014, Digital artwork.

Was there a certain point in time that you became more aware/self-conscious of climate change/sustainability issues?

When I first started taking art seriously in my 20’s one of the things that I was most concerned about was selling at shows, and comic cons and events and making money.

I worked on several pieces, picked the best one that I thought would sell and made a bunch of glossy prints to sell at said show. The goal being to sell all of them and make my money back and even a little profit.  After 8 hours at whatever show or convention [- sometimes 16 hours--- if the event was over 2 days], I wouldn’t sell a thing. I’d come home with all of the print merchandise that I left with. So all that paper and material that I used is just sitting on a shelf or closet someplace, wasted.

I have since stopped doing conventions and events and printing up work to try and sell. 

Not so much because of discouragement, but more because it’s honestly too much material to waste. Now I am a strictly digital artist. I carry a mini sketchbook around for ideas. However, I don’t make prints and I don’t work on easels or use paint tubes. 

This is not to disparage people that do. For me I feel better about my work only living in the digital medium from a waste and resource standpoint. I even bought a projector to show work digitally when I get the opportunity instead of printing up large scale sized pieces. This is to avoid the inevitable clutter or trash that would go in the closet after the show or event is over. I have been going this minimal route for years and I have felt better about doing my part to keep the materials out of the landfill.

"Ebenezer Baptist Church", 2014, digital artwork.

"Greetings from Norway Part 2", 2019, digital artwork

Have you reduced your carbon footprint in your professional practice in any way over the last few years. If so, how?

I try to be really mindful of how I live and how it impacts materials and the environment. I use and reuse materials as much as I can. Aside from working digitally, I also reuse any paper that I can so as not to create more clutter (when I do work traditionally).

Small things like that, don’t seem major, but are my small way of contributing which might have some impact over the long run.

Do you think artists have a responsibility to respond to these issues? Why/Why not?

I think that artists have a responsibility to share their point of view with the world. However, if they have a strong point of view on sustainability and environment then yes absolutely they should. Not only that, but if there is also a way for that artist to make their work live and breathe and directly engage the public through live events and engaging installations and street art, then so much the better. There are ways that I have seen artists try to address this concern both in their work and in the materials that they use (eg. making work that is only sourced from recycled materials, etc.). I recently saw a street artist create a series of sustainable wall murals that will be recycled once taken down. The short answer is I don’t know if there is an answer. However for me, going fully digital has been my way to contribute to the solution and maybe that is a first step.

“On the Way Home”, 2018, digital artwork.

"Greetings from Norway Part 3", 2019, Digital artwork

Is there anything else you would like to add on this topic?

Not really, only that I will continue to find ways to share work and express my ideas, and now I will also pay more attention to the ways that I express them by keeping my environmental impact forever in mind.

Where can people find more of your work?

Website: www.moemurdock.com

Instagram: Moebocop

“Bandit - Self Portrait”, 2010, digital artwork

“Seeing Eye Dog”, 2018, digital artwork.

View the other Future of Art interviews:

FUTURE OF ART 

Subscribe to receive new interviews by email:

SUBSCRIBE

The Future of Art Interview: Katharina Forster

The Future of Art is an interview series where I speak with artists on the topics of sustainability and climate change in relation to their artistic practices. The series aims to explore a range of viewpoints, not only those of artists working directly with these topics but also how it affects the practices of all artists, no matter their chosen themes or mediums. 

Our next artist is Katharina Forster. Katharina Forster is a German artist who studied at the Ruth Prowse School of Art in Cape Town, South Africa. Her work spans the fields of installation, sculpture and participative works. She now lives and works in Werder (Havel), just outside Berlin.

Tell us about your art. What do you create and why?

I create sculptures and installations from different, often found and used materials. The works I create are for exhibitions and public art events as well as for artlovers and collectors.
The topics evolve around the complex themes of human interactions with one another as well as their environment. I share experiences, thoughts and observations on the diversity of our world today through the choice of materials, the finished form and the way of making.

My inspiration is found through close observation of the people around me, current news in print and online media, as well as through travels and from being a parent.

How long have you been practicing as an artist?

For more than 10 years now.

Avalanche, 2017, (detail), found objects on textiles, 80x400x9cm

Integrity, 2012, teabags, razorwire, thread, each 400x80x80cm

How have the topics of climate change and/or sustainability affected your artistic practice either directly or indirectly?

Although this topic has not been my driving force as an artist, many of my sculptures relate indirectly to the topics of sustainability as I frequently use found or discarded materials.

There was also an article by Hanno Rauterberg which struck a cord when he stated that artists are polluting with all their unseen artworks*.

Rauterberg likes to make bold statements and this one definitely stuck with me and influenced my art-making directly.

Was there a certain point in time that you became more aware/self-conscious of climate change/sustainability issues?

I guess I have been brought up already aware of being a conscious consumer which definitely had a lasting effect on me.


When I lived abroad in the global south and had to change my euro-centric point of view, things also started to shift. At that time my partner studied economics and was interested in alternatives which broadened our understanding of what is possible.

Another aspect involved in doing one’s best to live a more sustainable life, is the step of becoming a parent. Apparently each baby wearing disposable diapers creates, on average, 3 tonnes of waste by the age of 3. It was definitely something we as parents had to think about in order to make an informed decision.

Liese Lotte, Diapers, thread.

Integrity, 2012, teabags, razorwire, thread.

Have you reduced your carbon footprint in your professional practice in any way over the last few years. If so, how?

In my art practice I am reluctant to buy things new if I can get them secondhand somewhere else. This is applicable in my private life too. There is a certain reluctance towards the thought of how many things are made and sold new. Is there really a need for all that?

Let's look at the teabags I work with: I could just go and buy them in bulk, soak and dry them but I prefer to ask people to keep their used teabags for me. When I started my first big sculpture (Integrity) I asked a nearby old-age home to collect their used teabags for me. In this way I received almost more teabags than I could use, which would have otherwise been thrown away.

Do you think artists have a responsibility to respond to these issues? Why/Why not?

No, I don't think artists have any more responsibility than anyone else. Climate change or sustainability issues are a matter for everybody who can make a difference. If artists make these issues part of their work, I hope it’s solely by their own choice. Some of those works are of striking significance. Personally, I don't mind if people think of those issues when looking at my work, even if my focus was different.

Mutuality, 2017, yellow plastic bags, metal, 200x120x120mm

Left to right - Flow: blue umbrella, artificial hair, found objects; Flow: red leather handbag, artificial hair, found objects, Flow: green watering can, artificial hair, found objects.

Is there anything else you would like to add on this topic?

I would like to suggest two further readings:

1. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About The World - And Why Things Are Better Than You Think, Hans & Ola Rosling, 2018

2. The website gapminder gives valuable statistic insights and tools about the economic and social development of the world.

Where can people find more of your work?

Website: Katharina Forster

Instagram: @kath_meandmyhands

Patreon: meandmyhands

Follow the Future of Art Interview series:

INSTAGRAM

Subscribe to receive new interviews by email:

SUBSCRIBE

*Hanno Rauterberg, 'und das ist Kunst?! - Eine Qualitätsprüfung', Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 2008)

The Future of Art Interview: Adrienn Ujhazi

The Future of Art is an interview series where I speak with artists on the topics of sustainability and climate change in relation to their artistic practices. The series aims to explore a range of viewpoints, not only those of artists working directly with these topics but also how it affects the practices of all artists, no matter their chosen themes or mediums. 

Our next artist is Adrienn Ujhazi. Based in Novi Sad in Serbia, Ujhazi focuses her interdisciplinary practice on ecological and bio art practices.

Research and experimentation are her foundations. Installations, videos, objects and ready-mades are the final forms.

She appropriates natural materials, transforming them with minimal intervention in order to create the final results of her work. Videography and photography are necessary parts of her work, allowing her to document the entire artistic process.

Tell us about your art. What led you to artistic practice and what do you create? 

The drive to do artistic research came to me intuitively and naturally. My inspiration originates from my childhood. I was influenced by my grandmothers (one was a tailor, the other one is a housewife with a broad knowledge of gardening).

My plan was to expand my creativity using unconventional materials, organic shapes, textures, and to present them to the public in a unique way. As the years passed, my work developed in the direction of abstraction, but at the same time it keeps reminding me of the micro-world of biodiversity.

From the series "Thats's Life..", Object (wheat ear in formaline) 20 x 15 cm

From the series "Cycle of Gaia" (2018) The facility (acrylic-covered wheat cakes – plastic and covered with glass) 7 x 21 x 24 cm

One of the first natural materials I chose for my work was wheat. It is a historical symbol and a basic nutritional source. Therefore, I emphasize it's importance to humankind through different time periods. My opinion is that in the near future, because of our environment, we will eager to use only Bio products in our everyday lives.

By appropriating nature, I am promoting aesthetic and poetic expressions that boost a conscious relationship between humans and nature. As an interdisciplinary artist, I let the various fields I work in flow into one visual and aesthetic whole. 

What compels you to work in the field of ecological and bio art?

We enter the third decade of the 21st century, with the same habits and irresponsible attitude towards nature prevailing, with very few people as exceptions. With great passion for art, I want to raise more awareness and improve the attitude of people towards their own environment, the nature surrounding them.

Today, we live in the world of decisions, where each individual could take a step towards change.

Photo document of the experiment with scoby - From the series of Biophilia, 2019

My new project, that I am completing for my master studies, is closely connected to this theme. I am researching a new organic material, a scoby-fungus that develops from fermented (black) tea.

The name of this series is "BIOPHILIA". Biophilia aims to show the instinctive connection of humans with all living systems. The second part of the Biophilia project is situated within the field of applied arts. I created my first scoby hat, which is a 100% sustainable, eco-friendly and zero waste material. I have had positive results and received positive feedback for this project and I am looking forward to possible collaborations with other people involved in this field.

Photo document of the experiment with scoby - From the series of Biophilia, 2019

Photo document of the experiment with scoby - From the series of Biophilia, 2019

Have the topics of climate change and/or sustainability affected your artistic practice either directly or indirectly?

As a young artist from Serbia, I am constantly following the foreign artistic scenes, especially the ones originating from northern european countries. Bio art is my field in the fine art practices, which has developed significantly during the first and second decade in the 21st century. Bio design, organic and sustainable art practices are now going viral, because of the environmental issues we face.

As I observe our circumstances and how art reflects our society, I have come to the conclusion that bio art will soon be the leading field in contemporary art practices. Soon we won't be able to ignore the nature we destroyed - our environment. Everybody will feel it in some way, but by then, it will be too late to act. 

Worldwide there are universities, residencies, workshops etc. whose concepts are based on building bridges and connecting bio-organic art and design with science and technology. There are people who are working very hard with good will and compassion to find new solutions. Sometimes we need to go back to the beginning to get a clear view of everything.

Solo exhibition "Cycles of Gaia", Gallery "Meander", Apatin, Serbia

Have you reduced your carbon footprint in your professional practice in any way over the last few years. If so, how?

My main motivation is to experiment with technical resources. My curiosity lead me to this field, to create something which is of good quality and causes less damage to the environment. That is why I turned towards organic materials. My opinion is that artists have their free choice to show that there is a chance for a better future. Feeding the current negative mindset is not going to change anything, it will only increase fear and anger. In some cases artworks are, and have to be, brutal and honest, to get people shocked or to question themselves. In that case the product should also be compatible with a low carbon footprint.

Photo document of the experiment with scoby - From the series Biophilia, 2019

From the series "Cycle of Gaia" -“Leftover” (2018.) The facility (acrylic-covered wheat cakes - plastic, on a wooden spoon wrapped in a gauze and placed in a white box and covered with glass) 7 x 21 x 24 cm

Do you think artists have a responsibility to respond to these issues? Why/Why not?

In social life, the artist's role has always been important. Social media has provided a platform for artists to develop themselves regardless of where they live. Now they have the opportunity to say something with their creations. Recently, there have been many social media artists who work only for aesthetics, which is also acceptable, but it should not be their main drive. Art has to seduce and educate people, not to be invisible and passed by.

For me, as an artist, I'm eager to create and share my creative perspective by accentuating the biggest global issue, which is our environment.

 

 

"The seed is not just a source of life. This is the very foundation of our being."

- Vandana Shiva, ecofeminist

Vandana Shiva has been a major influence on my creativity.

Portrait photo with scoby in a glass 2019. Photo by Dejan Krstić

Where can people find more of your work?

Instagram: @adrienn_ujhazi

Behance: @adrienn_ujhazi

Follow the Future of Art Interview series:

INSTAGRAM

Subscribe to receive new interviews by email:

SUBSCRIBE

The Future of Art: Interview with Jeremy Knowles

The Future of Art is an interview series where I speak with artists on the topics of sustainability and climate change in relation to their artistic practices. The series aims to explore a range of viewpoints, not only those of artists working directly with these topics but also how it affects the practices of all artists, no matter their chosen themes or mediums. 

Our first artist is Jeremy Knowles. Originally from the UK, Knowles lives and works in Berlin.

Jeremy has a ritual of walking and photographing in Berlin in the mornings. The images presented here have been captured in the last two years and reflect his interest in capturing the unnoticed aspects of Berlin life. The emphasis on colour and vibrancy in the morning light playfully awaken us to how much colour exists around us when we take the time to look.

Jeremy, tell us about your art. What do you create and why?

I’m a lens-based artist interested in the city and how we, as inhabitants, activate it. A tool I use regularly in Berlin, where I live, is to explore my neighborhood on foot without any purpose. This was a method of play suggested by The Situationists who, ultimately, aimed to subvert capitalism through their work in city planning in the 1960s and early 70s. We are often unaware of the subtle ways in which modern cities are designed for commerce. Most of the things we encounter daily have been structured to encourage us to spend our money. I think there’s a lot of tension in this topic and thus, for me, space for both reflection and comment.

How long have you been practicing as an artist?

I graduated from University in London in 2015 and have been living and working as an artist in Berlin ever since. I left London feeling low on energy and low on inspiration. I think cities can have this effect on us sometimes if we don’t sync with what that place has to offer. Other places can be nourishing and encourage growth. Berlin has a rhythm and conciseness that works better for me, personally.

Have the topics of climate change and/or sustainability affected your artistic practice either directly or indirectly?

The bulk of my artistic practice is driven by observations made along walks within Berlin. For whatever reason, I am naturally drawn towards trash and discarded items – the ‘things’ I find left out on the street from the previous day. I really enjoy the process of using my art to transform an object of little or no value into something ‘beautiful’. Within this understanding is, of course, the question of how we value objects and what we define as beautiful.

 

The objective of my artwork is not to point the finger or suggest a solution, but merely to direct a different focus on the issue of sustainability within our day-to-day lives. The placement of value for objects and items of utility is very personal – I see aesthetic value where other people might see nothing at all. These objects have a life of their own, and perhaps that’s all I’m saying in my artwork.

Was there a certain point in time that you became more aware or self-conscious of climate change and sustainability issues?

I moved to London aged 20 having lived in the countryside my entire life. This was a very transformative time for me where lots of new inspiration and issues came my way. Climate change was a significant topic of interest at the time for many of my peers, but although I was very aware of the issue I didn’t feel I had a new or different position to take. All of my ideas come from direct experiences in my life, and so it wasn’t until later that I had a feeling to comment on sustainability. In the end, we can only do our part to help, and that starts on an individual level by changing small tendencies before they become long-term habits.

Have you reduced your carbon footprint in your professional practice in any way over the last few years. If so, how?

I’m quite conscious, in my day-to-day life, of my overall usage and consumption. I don’t own a car, I try to minimize international flights, I avoid buying plastic when possible, I don’t eat meat, and when I can afford to I will buy bio (organic) produce. We all know this of course... but if everyone found ways to minimize consumption within their lives it would significantly reduce the effects of climate change. But I’m also coming from a position of real privilege, and for many people these changes simply aren’t possible.

My professional practice is also not too taxing on the environment, so far as I understand. I’m not one of those photographers who quickly replaces equipment in order to stay updated with the latest tech. I like to make good use of something before I pass it on, and I always buy second hand.

Do you think artists have a responsibility to respond to these issues? 

No, I don’t think artists have any responsibilities. Artists comment on a multitude of issues, which is all well and good, but they have no more responsibility to respond to climate change than anyone else. We all play a part in the solution/problem.

Where can people find more of your work?

Website: www.jeremyknowles.co.uk

Instagram: @jeremyphilipknowles

Follow the Future of Art Interview series:

INSTAGRAM

Subscribe to receive new interviews by email:

SUBSCRIBE